Industry weighs in on VoIP intervention
There are many concerns today about upcoming potential threats to this new technology. Amid reports that some cable companies may be intentionally downgrading service, there are further concerns that Congress and the FCC will intervene in such a way that technology is stifled. Here is a synopsis from 8x8 of a recent talk by their CEO, Bryan Martin:
Recently, I gave a keynote presentation at the California Communications Association (CalCom) Annual Conference in Monterey, California. After providing an overview of the California VoIP industry and 8x8’s Packet8 service offerings in particular, I closed by arguing that it is vital for California to take the lead in opposing the application of archaic telecommunications regulations to Internet Phone Service.
Policymakers must understand that VoIP is an Internet application that delivers unique and enhanced capabilities. They need to be aware that Internet phone service is beginning to drive consumer demand for broadband (high-speed) Internet connections.
A traditionally regulated structure for VoIP and other broadband applications will stifle innovation, development and deployment to consumers. This was demonstrated last year when many VoIP companies put new service offerings on the back burner while they focused resources on implementing Federal-mandated Enhanced 911 (emergency response) capabilities.
Use of the same regulations that govern traditional phone service would stifle deployment while missing opportunities to reform the structure and implementation of important social service programs and their funding (such as Universal Service). These programs need to be updated to bring them in line with 21st century technologies.
Policymakers need to practice restraint and employ regulation only to support important public safety and other social goals, and only to the extent that such regulation is specifically tailored to the realities of the Internet world.
I encourage everyone who enjoys all the benefits of Internet phone service to make sure that their local, state and federal lawmakers know that they should oppose unnecessary and archaic regulations so as not to limit or kill this revolution in telecommunications.
